Is a decision that aligns with the Utilitarian Principle always fair to everyone affected?

The Utilitarian Principle focuses on achieving the greatest good for the greatest number of people. This often means that decisions are made to maximize overall happiness or benefit, which can inadvertently lead to scenarios where the needs or rights of a minority are overshadowed or overlooked. While the intent is to promote a positive outcome for the majority, it does not guarantee that every individual affected is treated fairly or equitably.

This approach can result in outcomes where the majority's benefit comes at the expense of the minority's well-being, leading to potential injustices. For instance, a policy may be designed that provides significant benefits to a large group of individuals while imposing significant costs or burdens on a smaller group. Hence, the very nature of utilitarianism can create situations where fairness is compromised, as it prioritizes overall utility rather than the equitable treatment of all affected parties.